JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)October 22, 2002

A- de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant Luis Alfredo Fragoso Torres

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se dejó sin efecto el auto proferido por la Sala de Casación Penal de la Corte Suprema de Justicia, mediante la cual se declaró incompetente para conocer de la acción de tutela promovida por el ciudadano de la referencia y se declaró la nulidad de lo actuado, toda vez que la citada Corte como superior funcional, del Tribunal Superior de Ibagué, Sala Penal, le corresponde surtir la segunda instancia en el proceso contra la Sala Jurisdiccional Disciplinaria del Tolima – Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (2 points)
  1. Primero. Dejar sin efecto el auto de julio 9 de 2002 proferido por la Sala de Casación Penal de la Corte Suprema de Justicia, mediante la cual se declaró incompetente para conocer de la acción de tutela promovida por Luis Alfredo Fragoso Torres contra la Sala Jurisdiccional Disciplinaria del Tolima - Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura, y se declaró la nulidad de lo actuado.
  2. Segundo. Remitir a la Sala de Casación Penal de la Corte Suprema de Justicia el expediente del proceso de la acción de tutela promovida por Luis Alfredo Fragoso Torres contra la Sala Jurisdiccional Disciplinaria del Tolima - Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura, para que se resuelva la impugnación.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.